Negative Gearing: What It Looks Like on a $750k Property

Quick Look

Focus: How negative gearing affects the cash flow and tax position of a property investor.

Key Takeaways:

  • Negative gearing can reduce your tax, but it still costs real money each year
  • Depreciation boosts your paper losses without affecting cash
  • Even on a $750k property, out-of-pocket costs can exceed $9,000 per year
  • Reading Time: ≈ 6 minutes

Introduction

You’ve probably heard that property investors can “claim a tax loss” through negative gearing — but what does that really mean? And how much does it cost in real terms?

Let’s break it down using a real-world example. We’ll walk through a $750,000 investment property, looking at actual loan costs, rental income, expenses, and tax implications — so you can see what negative gearing looks like in dollars and cents.

Context & Problem

Negative gearing is when your rental property makes a loss — that is, the annual expenses (including interest, maintenance, and depreciation) are higher than the rental income.

 

While that loss can reduce your taxable income and help with your tax bill, it doesn’t mean the investment is making money. You’re still out of pocket each year.

 

In high- interest rate environments, more properties are negatively geared — which makes it more important than ever to understand the cash impact and tax offsets involved.

Strategy & How To

Let’s walk through the example of a $750,000 investment property using the following assumptions:

Purchase & Loan Details
Property purchase price: $750,000
Deposit: $37,500 (5%)
Loan: $712,500 (95%)
Interest rate: 6.5% per annum (P&I)
Loan term: 30 years

Annual Costs
Property outgoings (rates, strata, etc.): $6,000
Landlord insurance: $1,500
Rental agent fees: $1,800
Loan repayments (P&I): ≈ $46,313 per year
Total costs (excluding depreciation): $55,613

Rental Income
$30,000 per year

Depreciation (non-cash deductions)
Fixtures & fittings: $10,000
Bricks & mortar: $4,000
Total depreciation: $14,000

 

Step 1 – Work Out the Cash Flow
Annual income: $30,000
Annual expenses (excluding depreciation): $63,420
Cash shortfall: $33,420

This is the real cash cost to the owner — even before tax savings.

Step 2 – Calculate the Tax Loss
Remove principal ($7,808) and add depreciation ($14,000) to the cash shortfall:
$33,420 – $7,808 + $4,000 = $39,612

Tax deductible loss = $39,612

At a 32% marginal tax rate:
Tax refund or saving: 32% x $39,612 = $12,478

Step 3 – Final Cash Impact
Cash loss: $33,420
Minus tax benefit: $12,478
Net cost to investor: approximately $20,942 per year

That’s about $402 per week out of pocket — even after the tax refund.

Warning: this is an example of a typical scenario to show how negative gearing works. Because every situation will have different levels of income, interest rates and costs, you must seek professional advice before proceeding with negative geared investment.

Case Study

Let’s call our investor Emily. She’s a 35-year-old earning $95,000 a year, putting her on a 32% marginal tax rate. Emily buys a $750k investment property with a 5% deposit and no stamp duty. The property earns $30,000 a year in rent but costs her over $63,000 to hold. Thanks to depreciation, her tax bill is reduced by almost $15,000.

Common Questions & Misconceptions

Isn’t negative gearing free money from the government?
  • No — you’re still making a real cash loss. The tax refund just softens the blow.
  • Yes — depreciation is a non-cash deduction for wear and tear on the building and fittings, as per ATO guidelines. But the property needs to qualify.
  • Maybe — but rising interest rates or maintenance costs can offset rental growth. It’s not guaranteed.
  • Yes — but only the portion used for the investment. If you redraw or refinance for personal reasons, that part may not be deductible.
  • Not usually. As the loan reduces or interest rates fall, many properties become neutrally or positively geared. And tax laws may change in future.

Conclusion

Negative gearing can provide tax benefits — but it still costs real money. In our $750,000 example, the investor is more than $18,000 out of pocket each year, even after tax savings.

If you’re considering this strategy, it’s important to run the numbers — and get help. Knowing your cash flow and tax impact up front can save you big headaches later.

Ready for Personalised Property Investment Advice?

Join moneyGPS for low cost, tailored Property guidance that’s delivered completely online. You’ll get:

  • Personalised recommendations based on your own figures
  • Easy to read digital Statements of Advice
  • Unlimited access to qualified Money Coaches for follow up questions

Start your moneyGPS journey now and make every super dollar work harder.

Need Full Scope Financial Planning?
If you think you might need a holistic roadmap that leaves nothing out, consider booking a discovery meeting with a fully licensed Financial Planner.

  • Work one on one with the Planner
  • Get ongoing support through every stage of your financial journey

Book a discovery call with Planning IQ today and take the first confident step towards comprehensive wealth management.

Disclosure: General information only. Consider your objectives, financial situation and needs, and seek professional advice before acting.

How We Keep It Trustworthy

Every article includes a Review & Fact Check section below — so you know exactly where our facts come from, what’s uncertain, and whether there’s any bias.

Review & Fact Check

1. Fact References
  • Loan repayment calculated using a standard P&I formula: $712,500 loan over 30 years at 6.5% p.a. ≈ $54,120/year
  • ATO guidance on rental property deductions: ato.gov.au
  • Depreciation rules verified via ATO Rental Properties 2023 Guide
  • Assumed property outgoings, insurance, and agent fees are reasonable estimates but not ATO-verified
  • Assumed depreciation values used for illustration
  • Loan rate and tax rate accurate as of June 2025
  • Depreciation values and property market assumptions may become outdated
  • Article is neutral, educational, and based on general principles
  • Does not promote specific products or investments